Make your own free website on

Dramatis Personae


The Ranger
The only one of the new heroes with any link to the last age of legends.
The Elbiax (Conversion Pending)
Horror walks among us, and it is even worse than this thing...
Sweetheart (Conversion Pending)
A lovely young girl who's older than America, with ties to ancient Atlantis, to boot.
Kathy Norris (Conversion Pending)
Girl Detective and Occult Investigator.


The Joker (Conversion Pending)
Batman's enemy was the second to bear this name, and the original may have been even worse.
Harley Quinn (Conversion Pending)
Don't believe cartoons. There was nothing cute or sweet about her.

Supporting Cast

James Taunton (Conversion Pending)
Don't call him "Tonto".
Nicholas Marseilles (Conversion Pending)
Don't even think of calling him "Tonto".

Reservists (Players incommunicado)

Raja the Enchanter (Conversion Pending)
He could tell you why Houdini never found any real magic.
Green Lantern (Conversion Pending)
Maybe what you might think, but not who you might think.

Conversion Notes

Unlike most conversion notes, I will begin by explaining what is wrong with virtually every game system conversion method that I have ever encountered. These methods, especially in the superhero genre, indulge in one, and sometimes in all three, of the following unsuccessful mistakes:

Attempt to convert by going through each game's "real world" equivalents.

This is doomed to failure. Indeed, anyone with real knowledge of the games in question would immediately see this by comparing what each game considers to be a "normal human". There are no two game systems on the market that give the same "real world" abilities to an ordinary human being. If the games can't agree on that single point, why presume that their "real world" to game system conversions would be compatible? Game systems are designed, first and foremost, for internal systematic consistency.

Attempt to convert by assigning "point value" equivalents across the board.

This is based on the unwarranted, and invariably false, assumption that all game designers put exactly the same relative cost on various abilities in a game. "Conversions" based upon this paradigm include infamous "Every AD&D level equals so many GURPS character points". It just doesn't work. First, these methods presume that the "balance" of one game's systems is identical to the "balance" of every other games' systems. Second, these methods presume that the implicit and explicit character design emphases within each game are identical. Both presumptions are, of course, false.

Violating the internal paradigms of each game.

The most intractable error of most of these conversions, though, is that they forget a simple fact of music: A trombone is not a violin. A violin is not a French horn. I sometimes wonder if gamers are aware of that little detail. What has this to do with conversion notes for a game? I can take a violin concerto and try to get a French horn player to play it. His lips would probably implode from attempting to get such high notes. I could do a simple-minded transposition down however many intervals is necessary and claim that it was sufficient. Neither methods really would work. What has to be done when changing a musical piece from one instrument to another is to understand what will and will not work for that instrument. The fact that a French horn cannot glissade does not mean that the violin should be prohibited from the glissade if that is what really works in the violin version. Likewise, the chroma of the French horn should not be neglected simply because the violin has a different sonority.

An example of this error in games is in an old DC to Champions conversion. DC Heroes does not have the END mechanic as the default. Therefore, the conversion very simple-mindedly stated that all DC Heroes characters should have their powers bought with zero END cost. What the author of the conversion simply did not realize is that in Champions, zero END is not the norm. Paying END is part of the paradigm of the game. Therefore, to truly convert a character to Champions, a character with a normal DC Heroes power generally should pay END in the Champions version--because that is more true to the Champions paradigm.

The Gist

The whole point of this essay is to explain why the converted GURPS charcters might not function "exactly" like they would in DC Heroes. Rather than try to make "exact versions", I have used the DC Heroes originals as the original composition wherefrom the GURPS "arrangement" could be derived. My methods were not arbitrary, and there was a system behind it. I just haven't written that system up. With no further ado, I present the GURPS version of More Action Fun:

Special Notes

GURPS conversion presented a fairly thorny problem. The rules system for GURPS Supers is explicitly first-order linear, while the rules system for nearly every other superhero game is explicitly not. I banged my head against the wall on this issue until I realized something: I was indulging in the "Real World Equivalents" fallacy! I took a look at GURPS as a game system rather than a simulation, and it struck me. For many of their functions, GURPS attributes, regardless of their "real world" definitions are not first-order linear. Instead, they represent points along a pseudo-normal curve, and that pseudo-normal curve has a sufficiently close relationship to an exponential curve in my area of interest (better than ordinary human but a good deal less than earth-shaking) for a lot of conversions to actually be closer to first-order linear. The only problem attribute was GURPS ST. I readily admit that that particular feature of the conversion is a kludge.

Another great weakness in GURPS vis this conversion is that GURPS has no "any power" power, a-la Green Lantern, so some of the characters are severely improvised.

To Headquarters!